↓ Skip to main content

Circulating Metabolic Biomarkers of Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer in the ProtecT Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating Metabolic Biomarkers of Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer in the ProtecT Study
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, January 2019
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charleen Adams, Rebecca C Richmond, Diana L. Santos Ferreira, Wes Spiller, Vanessa Y Tan, Jie Zheng, Peter Wurtz, Jenny L. Donovan, Freddie C. Hamdy, David E. Neal, J. Athene Lane, George Davey Smith, Caroline L. Relton, Rosalind A. Eeles, Brian E. Henderson, Christopher A. Haiman, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Sonja I. Berndt, David V. Conti, Fredrik Wiklund, Stephen J. Chanock, Susan M. Gapstur, Victoria L. Stevens, Catherine M. Tangen, Jyotsna Batra, Judith A. Clements, Henrik Grönberg, Nora Pashayan, Johanna Schleutker, Demetrius Albanes, Alicja Wolk, Catharine M L West, Lorelei A. Mucci, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin, Stella Koutros, Karina D Sørensen, Lovise Maehle, Ruth C. Travis, Robert Hamilton, Sue Ann Ingles, Barry S Rosenstein, Yong-Jie Lu, Graham G. Giles, Adam S Kibel, Ana Vega, Manolis Kogevinas, Kathryn L. Penney, Jong Y. Park, Janet L. Stanford, Cezary Cybulski, Borge G. Nordestgaard, Hermann Brenner, Christiane Maier, Jeri Kim, Esther M. John, Manuel R. Teixeira, Susan L. Neuhausen, Kim DeRuyck, Azad Razack, Lisa F Newcomb, Davor Lessel, Radka P. Kaneva, Nawaid Usmani, Frank Claessens, Paul Townsend, Manuela Gago Dominguez, Monique J Roobol, Florence Menegaux, Kay-Tee Khaw, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hardev Pandha, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Richard M. Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Professor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Computer Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 44 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,614,558
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,279
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,731
of 445,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.