↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Childhood Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12098-015-1988-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renu Suthar, Arushi Gahlot Saini, Naveen Sankhyan, Jitendra Kumar Sahu, Pratibha Singhi

Abstract

To study the clinical profile, and outcome of children with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. This is a retrospective case series of children <12 y of age, diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis at a tertiary care institute during the period, May 2013 through June 2015. Twenty patients were tested for suspected anti-NMDAR encephalitis over this 2 y period. Of these, six children were positive for anti-NMDAR antibodies. Four of these six children had completed treatment and two are currently receiving immunotherapy. Behavioral changes, psychosis, seizures and oro-lingual-facial dyskinesia were the presenting features. Extreme irritability, insomnia and mutism were noted in all the children. The symptoms were persistent, and the course was progressive over 4-8 wk duration. Neuroimaging and electroencephalography were non-specific. Intravenous pulse methylprednisolone and immunoglobulins were used as first-line therapeutic agents. Only one patient responded to first line immunotherapy; five out of six children required second-line immunotherapy. One patient recovered following rituximab, and two patients showed a good response to cyclophosphamide pulse therapy; two patients are currently under treatment with second line immunotherapeutic agents. Tumor screen was negative in all children. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is rare but a potentially treatable condition. Timely recognition is essential because treatment is entirely different from other viral encephalitis. Aggressive immunotherapy is the key to a favourable outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Other 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 36%
Neuroscience 12 13%
Psychology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,117,572
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#262
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,167
of 398,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.