↓ Skip to main content

Multiscale evaluation of cellular adhesion alteration and cytoskeleton remodeling by magnetic bead twisting

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Multiscale evaluation of cellular adhesion alteration and cytoskeleton remodeling by magnetic bead twisting
Published in
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10237-015-0734-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Isabey, Gabriel Pelle, Sofia André Dias, Mathieu Bottier, Ngoc-Minh Nguyen, Marcel Filoche, Bruno Louis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 33%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#379
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,512
of 281,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.