You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Too much medicine: not enough trust?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2018-104866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoë Fritz, Richard Holton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 48% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 24% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#765,921
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#197
of 3,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,535
of 362,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.