↓ Skip to main content

“ScreenIT”: Computerized screening of swallowing, nutrition and distress in head and neck cancer patients during (chemo)radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Oral Oncology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,911)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“ScreenIT”: Computerized screening of swallowing, nutrition and distress in head and neck cancer patients during (chemo)radiotherapy
Published in
Oral Oncology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.01.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurelie R. Wall, Bena Cartmill, Elizabeth C. Ward, Anne J. Hill, Elizabeth Isenring, Joshua Byrnes, Suzanne Chambers, Jeff Dunn, Jodie Nixon, Jane Whelan, Sandro V. Porceddu

Abstract

In light of growing service demands, the use of computerized screening processes have been proposed to optimize patient triage and enhance the efficiency and synergy of multidisciplinary care practices. This study evaluated the accuracy of a novel system, ScreenIT, to detect swallowing, nutrition and distress status in HNC patients receiving (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT), and facilitate appropriate referrals for MDT management. Patient-reported data obtained from ScreenIT was compared to blinded face-to-face assessment by speech pathology/dietetic clinicians across five domains: side-effects, swallowing/oral intake, nutrition, distress, and need for supportive care services. Agreement was analysed using percent exact and close agreement (PEA/PCA) and kappa statistics. Clinically acceptable agreement (PEA/PCA 80% or higher) was achieved for the majority of domains. In areas of discordance, ScreenIT demonstrated a higher sensitivity to patient-perceived concerns, particularly regarding distress. Management pathways generated by ScreenIT initiated clinically appropriate referrals for high and medium-risk patients for swallowing/nutrition and distress. Findings suggest that ScreenIT may provide an effective and efficient means of monitoring swallowing, nutrition and distress status during (C)RT, and facilitate clinically appropriate prioritization of MDT supportive care intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 17%
Psychology 12 9%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 44 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#556,949
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Oral Oncology
#6
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,032
of 403,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral Oncology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.