↓ Skip to main content

Cost Analysis of the Mongolian ATLS© Program: A Framework for Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Cost Analysis of the Mongolian ATLS© Program: A Framework for Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00268-018-4795-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack E. Kornfeld, Micah G. Katz, James R. Cardinal, Batsaikhan Bat‐Erdene, Gerelmaa Jargalsaikhan, Jade Nunez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,548,510
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,074
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,492
of 350,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#45
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.