| Title |
The role of biogeochemical hotspots, landscape heterogeneity, and hydrological connectivity for minimizing forestry effects on water quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0751-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hjalmar Laudon, Lenka Kuglerová, Ryan A. Sponseller, Martyn Futter, Annika Nordin, Kevin Bishop, Tomas Lundmark, Gustaf Egnell, Anneli M. Ågren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 25% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 55 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,809
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,028
of 403,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#29
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.