| Title |
Postdigital Dialogue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Postdigital Science and Education, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x |
| Authors |
Petar Jandrić, Thomas Ryberg, Jeremy Knox, Nataša Lacković, Sarah Hayes, Juha Suoranta, Mark Smith, Anne Steketee, Michael Peters, Peter McLaren, Derek R. Ford, Gordon Asher, Callum McGregor, Georgina Stewart, Ben Williamson, Andrew Gibbons |
| Abstract |
This article is a multi-authored experimental postdigital dialogue about postdigital dialogue. Fourteen authors were invited to produce their sections, followed by two author-reviewers who examined the article as a whole. Authors were invited to reflect on Petar Jandric’s book Learning in the age of digital reason (2017) or to produce completely new insights. The article also contains a summary of book symposium on Learning in the age of digital reason held at the 2017 American Educational Research Conference (AERA). The authors are tentatively confident that this article produces more knowledge than the arithmetic sum of its constituent parts. However, they are also very aware of its limits and insist that their conclusions are not consensual or homogenous. As traditional forms of research increasingly fail to describe our current reality, they present this article as an experiment and a possible starting point for developing new dialogical research approaches fit for our postdigital reality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Germany | 3 | 12% |
| Denmark | 2 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#377,302
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from Postdigital Science and Education
#6
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,216
of 355,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postdigital Science and Education
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.