↓ Skip to main content

A task shifting approach to primary mental health care for adults in South Africa: human resource requirements and costs for rural settings

Overview of attention for article published in Health Policy & Planning, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A task shifting approach to primary mental health care for adults in South Africa: human resource requirements and costs for rural settings
Published in
Health Policy & Planning, February 2011
DOI 10.1093/heapol/czr012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inge Petersen, Crick Lund, Arvin Bhana, Alan J Flisher, the Mental Health and Poverty Research Programme Consortium

Abstract

BACKGROUND A recent situational analysis suggests that post-apartheid South Africa has made some gains with respect to the decentralization and integration of mental health into primary health care. However, service gaps within and between provinces remain, with rural areas particularly underserved. Aim This study aims to calculate and cost a hypothetical human resource mix required to populate a framework for district adult mental health services. This framework embraces the concept of task shifting, where dedicated low cost mental health workers at the community and clinic levels supplement integrated care. METHOD The expected number and cost of human resources was based on: (a) assumptions of service provision derived from existing services in a sub-district demonstration site and a literature review of evidence-based packages of care in low- and middle-income countries; and (b) assumptions of service needs derived from other studies. RESULTS For a nominal population of 100 000, minimal service coverage estimates of 50% for schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, major depressive disorder and 30% for post-traumatic stress disorder and maternal depression would require that the primary health care staffing package include one post for a mental health counsellor or equivalent and 7.2 community mental health worker posts. The cost of these personnel amounts to £28 457 per 100 000 population. This cost can be offset by a reduction in the number of other specialist and non-specialist health personnel required to close service gaps at primary care level. CONCLUSION The adoption of the concept of task shifting can substantially reduce the expected number of health care providers otherwise needed to close mental health service gaps at primary health care level in South Africa at minimal cost and may serve as a model for other middle-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 406 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 18%
Student > Master 69 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 84 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 21%
Psychology 77 19%
Social Sciences 64 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 95 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,288,711
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Health Policy & Planning
#1,128
of 2,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,255
of 205,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Policy & Planning
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.