↓ Skip to main content

Keeping Your Cool

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Keeping Your Cool
Published in
Sports Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.2165/11596870-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodney Siegel, Paul B. Laursen

Abstract

Exercising in hot environments results in a rise in core body temperature; an effect associated with impaired performance over a variety of exercise modes and durations. Precooling has become a popular strategy to combat this impairment, as evidence has shown it to be an effective method for lowering pre-exercise core temperature, increasing heat storage capacity and improving exercise performance in the heat. To date, the majority of precooling manoeuvres have been achieved via external means, such as cold water immersion and the application of cooling garments. However, these methods have been criticized for their lack of practicality for use in major sporting competitions. Recent evidence has shown that internal or endogenous cooling methods, such as drinking cold fluids or ice slurries, are able to lower core temperature and enhance endurance performance in the heat. These methods may be more advantageous than current forms of precooling, as ingesting cold fluids or ice slurries can be easily implemented in the field and provide the additional benefit of hydrating athletes. While the precise mechanisms responsible for these performance enhancements are yet to be fully explained, the effect of ice ingestion on brain temperature, internal thermoreception and sensory responses may be involved. This article addresses the evidence supporting the use of endogenous cooling methods for improving endurance performance in the heat, as well as discussing the potential mechanisms behind the improvements observed and providing practical recommendations to optimize their success.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 39 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,126,693
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#970
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,208
of 289,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#66
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.