| Title |
Assessment of Anthropogenic Influence on Antarctic Mycobiota in Areas of Russian Polar Stations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contemporary Problems of Ecology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s1995425518050074 |
| Authors |
I. Yu. Kirtsideli, D. Yu. Vlasov, Yu. K. Novozhilov, E. V. Abakumov, E. P. Barantsevich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,834,059
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Problems of Ecology
#13
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,587
of 349,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Problems of Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them