| Title |
Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying-Hua Yu, Wei Wei, Jian-Lun Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,744,540
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,155
of 8,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,997
of 249,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#25
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,517 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.