| Title |
Investigation of the textural and adsorption properties of activated carbon from HTC and pyrolysis carbonizates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13399-017-0280-8 |
| Authors |
Catalina Rodríguez Correa, Chatri Ngamying, Dietmar Klank, Andrea Kruse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 18% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,029,010
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
#8
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,873
of 316,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them