↓ Skip to main content

Icosapent ethyl in hypertriglyceridaemia: a guide to its use

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Icosapent ethyl in hypertriglyceridaemia: a guide to its use
Published in
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40267-016-0278-5
Authors

Katherine Lyseng-Williamson, Paul L. McCormack, Esther S. Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,436,183
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Therapy Perspectives
#121
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,507
of 394,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Therapy Perspectives
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.