| Title |
Jumping over a low hurdle: personal pension fund performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11156-015-0546-9 |
| Authors |
Anastasia Petraki, Anna Zalewska |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 26% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
#4
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,054
of 395,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them