| Title |
Evaluation of Skills in Arthroscopic Training Based on Trajectory and Force Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-008-0497-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasutaka Tashiro, Hiromasa Miura, Yoshitaka Nakanishi, Ken Okazaki, Yukihide Iwamoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 49% |
| Engineering | 18 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,841,279
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,066
of 7,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,418
of 98,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.