| Title |
Does Perception of Usefulness of Arthroscopic Simulators Differ with Levels of Experience?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-1797-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriëlle J. M. Tuijthof, P. Visser, Inger N. Sierevelt, C. Niek Van Dijk, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 46% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,898,870
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,077
of 7,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,517
of 194,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.