↓ Skip to main content

Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
29 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1967 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies
Published in
Blood, November 2007
DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaji K. Kumar, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Q. Lacy, Suzanne R. Hayman, Francis K. Buadi, Steven R. Zeldenrust, David Dingli, Stephen J. Russell, John A. Lust, Philip R. Greipp, Robert A. Kyle, Morie A. Gertz

Abstract

Treatments for myeloma have expanded in the last decade, but it is not clear if the introduction of novel therapies and the increased use of high-dose therapy have translated into better outcome for patients with myeloma. We examined the outcome of 2 groups of patients seen at a single institution, one from time of diagnosis and the other from the time of relapse, to examine the survival trends over time. Among 387 patients relapsing after stem-cell transplantation, a clear improvement in overall survival from the time of relapse was seen, with those relapsing after 2000 having a median overall survival of 23.9 versus 11.8 months (P < .001) for those who relapsed prior to this date. This improvement was independent of other prognostic factors. Patients treated with one or more of the newer drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) had longer survival from relapse (30.9 vs 14.8 months; P < .001). In a larger group of 2981 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, those diagnosed in the last decade had a 50% improvement in overall survival (44.8 vs 29.9 months; P < .001). In this study, we demonstrate improved outcome of patients with myeloma in recent years, both in the relapsed setting as well as at diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 663 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 116 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 14%
Student > Master 85 12%
Student > Bachelor 72 11%
Other 64 9%
Other 151 22%
Unknown 97 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 306 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 2%
Other 71 10%
Unknown 122 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,169,628
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#883
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,220
of 89,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#6
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.