↓ Skip to main content

Preference for and Maintenance of Anal Sex Roles Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Sociodemographic and Behavioral Correlates

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Preference for and Maintenance of Anal Sex Roles Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Sociodemographic and Behavioral Correlates
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9623-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chongyi Wei, H. Fisher Raymond

Abstract

Self-labeling of, and preference for, anal sex roles is an important aspect of identities and cultures among men who have sex with men (MSM) populations. In this article, we examined sociodemographic and behavioral correlates of preference for and maintenance of anal sex roles, and risk for HIV infection. Using time-location sampling, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of racially diverse MSM in San Francisco. Of the 386 men who reported an anal sex role preference, 41% preferred being "versatile" while 21 and 37% preferred being "bottom" and "top" only. Lower educated men, Asian/Pacific Islander men, and men born in Asia/Philippines were more likely to prefer being "bottom." Among all racial/ethnic groups, men in general did not maintain their preferences 100% of the time in their reported sexual behavior, and none of the racial/ethnic groups maintained their preference at greater or lesser levels than any other group. There were no significant differences in all the behavioral risks between men who maintained their preferences and those who did not. Yet, prevalence of HIV infection was two times higher among men who were strictly "bottom." Linguistically and/or culturally appropriate HIV prevention information/interventions at an appropriate educational level should be provided to those from the developing world and those of lower socioeconomic status, who may lack the knowledge of differential risks associated with anal sex activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Unspecified 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 24%
Social Sciences 13 18%
Unspecified 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,925
of 3,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,190
of 94,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.