↓ Skip to main content

Zeptosecond High Harmonic keV X-Ray Waveforms Driven by Midinfrared Laser Pulses

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zeptosecond High Harmonic keV X-Ray Waveforms Driven by Midinfrared Laser Pulses
Published in
Physical Review Letters, July 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.111.033002
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Hernández-García, J. A. Pérez-Hernández, T. Popmintchev, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, A. Jaron-Becker, A. Becker, L. Plaja

Abstract

We demonstrate theoretically that the temporal structure of high harmonic x-ray pulses generated with midinfrared lasers differs substantially from those generated with near-infrared pulses, especially at high photon energies. In particular, we show that, although the total width of the x-ray bursts spans femtosecond time scales, the pulse exhibits a zeptosecond structure due to the interference of high harmonic emission from multiple reencounters of the electron wave packet with the ion. Properly filtered and without any compensation of the chirp, regular subattosecond keV waveforms can be produced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 33%
Researcher 52 25%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 145 68%
Chemistry 13 6%
Engineering 12 6%
Materials Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 28 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,109,804
of 24,619,469 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#3,493
of 37,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,305
of 201,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#41
of 672 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,619,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 672 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.