↓ Skip to main content

Social cognition and metacognition in obsessive–compulsive disorder: an explorative pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Social cognition and metacognition in obsessive–compulsive disorder: an explorative pilot study
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00406-016-0669-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paraskevi Mavrogiorgou, Mareike Bethge, Stefanie Luksnat, Fabio Nalato, Georg Juckel, Martin Brüne

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a severe psychiatric condition that is, among other features, characterized by marked impairment in social functioning. Although theoretically plausible with regard to neurobiological underpinnings of OCD, there is little research about possible impairments in social cognitive and meta-cognitive abilities and their connections with social functioning in patients with OCD. Accordingly, we sought to examine social cognitive skills and metacognition in OCD. Twenty OCD patients and age-, sex-, and education-matched 20 healthy controls were assessed using neurocognitive and diverse social cognitive skills including the Ekman 60 Faces test, the Hinting Task, the faux pas test, and a proverb test. In addition, the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 was administered to both the OCD and the control groups. Social functioning was measured using the Personal and Social Performance Scale. Symptom severity in patients was determined by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale and the Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory. No group differences emerged in basic social cognitive abilities. In contrast, compared to controls, OCD patients scored higher on all MCQ dimensions, particularly negative beliefs about worry, uncontrollability, and danger; beliefs about need to control thoughts; and cognitive self-consciousness. There were no significant correlations between social or metacognitive parameters and OCD symptom severity. However, in the patient group, depression and metacognition predicted social functioning. OCD patients show normal basal social cognitive abilities, but dysfunctional metacognitive profiles, which may contribute to their psychosocial impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,703,064
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#780
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,643
of 400,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.