| Title |
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8,184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 11 | <1% |
| Spain | 9 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | <1% |
| Unknown | 8109 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1094 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 844 | 10% |
| Researcher | 658 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 565 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 425 | 5% |
| Other | 1523 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3075 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 982 | 12% |
| Engineering | 831 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 624 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 362 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 279 | 3% |
| Other | 1729 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3377 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#529,225
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#54
of 2,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,738
of 176,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.