↓ Skip to main content

Bringing High-Rate, CO2‑Based Microbial Electrosynthesis Closer to Practical Implementation through Improved Electrode Design and Operating Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bringing High-Rate, CO2‑Based Microbial Electrosynthesis Closer to Practical Implementation through Improved Electrode Design and Operating Conditions
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, February 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b04431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludovic Jourdin, Stefano Freguia, Victoria Flexer, Jurg Keller

Abstract

The enhancement of microbial electrosynthesis (MES) of acetate from CO2 to performance levels that could potentially support practical implementations of the technology must go through the optimization of key design and operating conditions. We report that higher proton availability drastically increases the acetate production rate with pH 5.2 found to be optimal, which will likely suppress methanogenic activity without inhibitor addition. Applied cathode potential as low as 1.1 V vs. SHE still achieved 99% of electron recovery in the form of acetate at a current density of around -200 A m 2. These current densities are leading to an exceptional acetate production rate of up to 1330 g m-2 day-1 at pH 6.7. Using highly open macroporous reticulated vitreous carbon electrodes with macropore sizes of about 0.6 mm diameter was found to be optimal to achieve a good balance between total surface area available for biofilm formation and effective mass transfer between the bulk liquid and the electrode/biofilm surface. Furthermore, we also successfully demonstrated the use of a synthetic biogas mixture as carbon dioxide source, yielding similarly high MES performance as pure CO2. This would allow this process to be used effectively for both biogas quality improvement and conversion of the available CO2 to acetate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 211 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 37 17%
Engineering 31 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Chemical Engineering 17 8%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 68 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#19,590
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,384
of 405,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#216
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.