↓ Skip to main content

Is Functional Outcome Different in Posterior and Anterior Circulation Stroke?

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Functional Outcome Different in Posterior and Anterior Circulation Stroke?
Published in
Stroke, November 2018
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.118.021785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Sommer, Alexandra Posekany, Wolfgang Serles, Martha Marko, Sebastian Scharer, Elisabeth Fertl, Julia Ferrari, Wilfried Lang, Milan Vosko, Simon Szabo, Stefan Kiechl, Michael Knoflach, Stefan Greisenegger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Neuroscience 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 32 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,702,181
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#2,839
of 12,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,212
of 365,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#67
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.