You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Seroprevalence for the tick-borne relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia turicatae among small and medium sized mammals of Texas
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006877 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brittany A. Armstrong, Alexander Kneubehl, Aparna Krishnavajhala, Hannah K. Wilder, William Boyle, Edward Wozniak, Carson Phillips, Kristen Hollywood, Kristy O. Murray, Taylor G. Donaldson, Pete D. Teel, Ken Waldrup, Job E. Lopez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 46% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,618,750
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,960
of 9,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,386
of 363,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#65
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.