You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Active medulloblastoma enhancers reveal subgroup-specific cellular origins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature16546 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Y. Lin, Serap Erkek, Yiai Tong, Linlin Yin, Alexander J. Federation, Marc Zapatka, Parthiv Haldipur, Daisuke Kawauchi, Thomas Risch, Hans-Jörg Warnatz, Barbara C. Worst, Bensheng Ju, Brent A. Orr, Rhamy Zeid, Donald R. Polaski, Maia Segura-Wang, Sebastian M. Waszak, David T. W. Jones, Marcel Kool, Volker Hovestadt, Ivo Buchhalter, Laura Sieber, Pascal Johann, Lukas Chavez, Stefan Gröschel, Marina Ryzhova, Andrey Korshunov, Wenbiao Chen, Victor V. Chizhikov, Kathleen J. Millen, Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy, Hans Lehrach, Marie-Laure Yaspo, Roland Eils, Peter Lichter, Jan O. Korbel, Stefan M. Pfister, James E. Bradner, Paul A. Northcott |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 36% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 67% |
| Scientists | 10 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 493 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 24% |
| Researcher | 87 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 80 | 16% |
| Unknown | 112 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 137 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Unknown | 128 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 264. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2025.
All research outputs
#170,953
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#9,799
of 116,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,453
of 453,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#191
of 904 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 904 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.