↓ Skip to main content

Traditional medicines and species extinction: another side to forensic wildlife investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,034)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
50 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Traditional medicines and species extinction: another side to forensic wildlife investigation
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12024-016-9742-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger W. Byard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Environmental Science 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Psychology 4 7%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#296,527
of 25,053,336 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#9
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,340
of 406,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,053,336 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.