You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With the Presence of Lynch Syndrome Pan-Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.18.00283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia Latham, Preethi Srinivasan, Yelena Kemel, Jinru Shia, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, Diana Mandelker, Sumit Middha, Jaclyn Hechtman, Ahmet Zehir, Marianne Dubard-Gault, Christina Tran, Carolyn Stewart, Margaret Sheehan, Alexander Penson, Deborah DeLair, Rona Yaeger, Joseph Vijai, Semanti Mukherjee, Jesse Galle, Mark A. Dickson, Yelena Janjigian, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Neil Segal, Leonard B. Saltz, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Anna M. Varghese, Dean Bajorin, Maria I. Carlo, Karen Cadoo, Michael F. Walsh, Martin Weiser, Julio Garcia Aguilar, David S. Klimstra, Luis A. Diaz, Jose Baselga, Liying Zhang, Marc Ladanyi, David M. Hyman, David B. Solit, Mark E. Robson, Barry S. Taylor, Kenneth Offit, Michael F. Berger, Zsofia K. Stadler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 54% |
| Scientists | 22 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 14% |
| Other | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 128 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 145 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#463,103
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#934
of 22,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,026
of 367,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#11
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.