↓ Skip to main content

Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With the Presence of Lynch Syndrome Pan-Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
409 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With the Presence of Lynch Syndrome Pan-Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2018
DOI 10.1200/jco.18.00283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia Latham, Preethi Srinivasan, Yelena Kemel, Jinru Shia, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, Diana Mandelker, Sumit Middha, Jaclyn Hechtman, Ahmet Zehir, Marianne Dubard-Gault, Christina Tran, Carolyn Stewart, Margaret Sheehan, Alexander Penson, Deborah DeLair, Rona Yaeger, Joseph Vijai, Semanti Mukherjee, Jesse Galle, Mark A. Dickson, Yelena Janjigian, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Neil Segal, Leonard B. Saltz, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Anna M. Varghese, Dean Bajorin, Maria I. Carlo, Karen Cadoo, Michael F. Walsh, Martin Weiser, Julio Garcia Aguilar, David S. Klimstra, Luis A. Diaz, Jose Baselga, Liying Zhang, Marc Ladanyi, David M. Hyman, David B. Solit, Mark E. Robson, Barry S. Taylor, Kenneth Offit, Michael F. Berger, Zsofia K. Stadler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 14%
Other 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Student > Master 23 7%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 126 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 143 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#458,333
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#922
of 22,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,983
of 363,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#11
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.