↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term effect of respiratory training for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at an outpatient clinic: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Long‐term effect of respiratory training for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at an outpatient clinic: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40169-015-0073-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fang Xi, Zheng Wang, Yong Qi, Richard Brightwell, Peter Roberts, Angus Stewart, Moira Sim, Wei Wang

Abstract

To assess the effect of respiratory training (RT) on lung function, activity tolerance and acute exacerbation frequency with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A randomised controlled trial. Outpatient clinic and home of the COPD patients, Zhengzhou City, China. Sixty participants with COPD were randomised into two groups: an intervention group (n = 30) which received the RT in self-management and a control group (n = 30) that received an education program during the study. Pulmonary function, activity tolerance and frequency of acute exacerbation of these COPD patients were evaluated before and after the program. The intervention and control programs were delivered at monthly outpatient clinic visits over a period of 12 months. The pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program was conducted by a physiotherapist (who delivered RT to the participant over a minimum of 1 h per visit) for the intervention group, whereas the control group received routine health education provided by physiotherapists. The intervention group patients were then instructed to perform exercises at home as taught in the RT at least 5 days per week at home. After 12 months of RT, the lung function and the activity tolerance of the COPD patients in the intervention group were significantly improved and the exacerbation frequency was also decreased. Long-term RT can improve lung function and activity tolerance while decreasing the frequency of acute exacerbation for COPD patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 28 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#851
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,850
of 291,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.