You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Historical photographs revisited: A case study for dating and characterizing recent loss of coral cover on the inshore Great Barrier Reef
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/srep19285 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tara R. Clark, Nicole D. Leonard, Jian-xin Zhao, Jon Brodie, Laurence J. McCook, David R. Wachenfeld, Ai Duc Nguyen, Hannah L. Markham, John M. Pandolfi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 7 | 21% |
United States | 7 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Ghana | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
Scientists | 10 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 24% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#449,954
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,005
of 141,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,135
of 406,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#150
of 3,255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.