↓ Skip to main content

Indirect genetic benefits of polyandry in a spider with direct costs of mating

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Indirect genetic benefits of polyandry in a spider with direct costs of mating
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00265-006-0234-9
Authors

Alexei A. Maklakov, Yael Lubin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
United States 3 5%
Malaysia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 81%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,694
of 67,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.