↓ Skip to main content

Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw
Published in
European Spine Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5806-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauro Costa Morais Tavares Junior, João Paço Vaz de Souza, Thiego Pedro Freitas Araujo, Raphael Martus Marcon, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante, Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho, Olavo Biraghi Letaif

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Psychology 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,653,753
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,511
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,917
of 350,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#74
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.