↓ Skip to main content

Effects of feeding state on anticoagulation in adult goats treated with warfarin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Artificial Organs, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Effects of feeding state on anticoagulation in adult goats treated with warfarin
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10047-016-0885-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuma Date, Satoru Kishimoto, Yutaka Fujii, Konomi Togo, Yukihide Kakuta, Toshihide Mizuno, Tomonori Tsukiya, Yoshiaki Takewa, Takashi Nishimura, Minoru Ono, Eisuke Tatsumi

Abstract

For the continued development of improved mechanical circulatory systems, longer term evaluation of new devices in animal model experiments may be critical. The effects of anticoagulants in adult goats have not been well studied. We assessed the effects of oral warfarin in three adult goats during fasting or after feeding. The goats [weighing 57.8 ± 8.1 kg (53.0-67.2 kg)] were administered warfarin orally beginning at a dose of 5 mg/day and then increasing to 10, 20, 40, and 60 mg every 2 weeks. One goat (receiving 10 mg/day warfarin) was killed on day 27 because of the inability to stand. After administration of 60 mg warfarin, the remaining goat received no warfarin for 4 days to return to coagulated state. The goats were then fasted and treated with 40 mg warfarin. During warfarin administration, both goats required a dose of 60 mg/day to achieve International Normalized Ratios (INRs) of approximately 2.5; however, when, the animals were in the fasted condition, precipitous extension of INR was observed in 5 days. After resuming feeding, the INR was reduced to the proper range. We showed the tendency that warfarin therapy in goats required higher doses than the doses administered to human patients and that the effects of therapy were related to the feeding state. The results of this study provide important information for development of anticoagulation protocols to assess mechanical circulatory support devices for long-term use in preclinical examination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,437,241
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#162
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,100
of 396,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.