↓ Skip to main content

Impaired topological architecture of brain structural networks in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a DTI study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Impaired topological architecture of brain structural networks in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a DTI study
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11682-015-9501-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changhong Li, Biao Huang, Ruibin Zhang, Qing Ma, Wanqun Yang, Lijuan Wang, Limin Wang, Qin Xu, Jieying Feng, Liqing Liu, Yuhu Zhang, Ruiwang Huang

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is considered as a neurodegenerative disorder of the brain central nervous system. But, to date, few studies adopted the network model to reveal topological changes in brain structural networks in PD patients. Additionally, although the concept of rich club organization has been widely used to study brain networks in various brain disorders, there is no study to report the changed rich club organization of brain networks in PD patients. Thus, we collected diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data from 35 PD patients and 26 healthy controls and adopted deterministic tractography to construct brain structural networks. During the network analysis, we calculated their topological properties, and built the rich club organization of brain structural networks for both subject groups. By comparing the between-group differences in topological properties and rich club organizations, we found that the connectivity strength of the feeder and local connections are lower in PD patients compared to those of the healthy controls. Furthermore, using a network-based statistic (NBS) approach, we identified uniformly significantly decreased connections in two modules, the limbic/paralimbic/subcortical module and the cognitive control/attention module, in patients compared to controls. In addition, for the topological properties of brain network topology in the PD patients, we found statistically increased shortest path length and decreased global efficiency. Statistical comparisons of nodal properties were also widespread in the frontal and parietal regions for the PD patients. These findings may provide useful information to better understand the abnormalities of brain structural networks in PD patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 24%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Psychology 13 15%
Engineering 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,182,332
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#234
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,770
of 396,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#12
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.