↓ Skip to main content

The role of 5-aminolevulinic acid in brain tumor surgery: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgical Review, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
The role of 5-aminolevulinic acid in brain tumor surgery: a systematic review
Published in
Neurosurgical Review, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10143-015-0695-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Ferraro, Eric Barbarite, Trevine R. Albert, Emmanuel Berchmans, Ashish H. Shah, Amade Bregy, Michael E. Ivan, Tyler Brown, Ricardo J. Komotar

Abstract

Recently, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) has been utilized as an adjuvant to the surgical resection of primary brain tumors and metastases. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to further understand the role of 5-ALA in neurosurgery. Our goal was to identify the utility of 5-ALA during resection by evaluating its sensitivity and specificity for different tumor types, as well as the extent of tumor resection achieved while using 5-ALA. A search of the literature was conducted using the PubMed database for the period January 1990 through May 2014. Surgical series in which 5-ALA was used for brain neoplasm resections were evaluated for tumor histology, sensitivity, specificity, extent of resection, complications, and outcomes. Twenty-two series, involving 1163 patients, were included in our review. 5-ALA sensitivity was highest in high-grade gliomas (85 %) and meningiomas (81 %). 5-ALA specificity was high in meningiomas (100 %), as well as metastases (84 %) and high-grade gliomas (82 %). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved using 5-ALA in 66.2 % of all gliomas and 69.6 % of meningiomas, regardless of histological subtype. 5-ALA may be a useful tool in increasing the extent of resection and achieving GTR in intracranial tumors. The resection of tumors for which 5-ALA has high sensitivity and specificity, such as high-grade gliomas, may lead to an increase in extent of resection when compared to operations using only standard white light. Further evidence for the use of 5-ALA in meningiomas and certain subtypes of metastases may be needed to qualify its efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 14%
Other 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,429,291
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgical Review
#75
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,061
of 396,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgical Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them