You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Small 6q16.1 Deletions Encompassing POU3F2 Cause Susceptibility to Obesity and Variable Developmental Delay with Intellectual Disability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul R. Kasher, Katherine E. Schertz, Megan Thomas, Adam Jackson, Silvia Annunziata, María J. Ballesta-Martinez, Philippe M. Campeau, Peter E. Clayton, Jennifer L. Eaton, Tiziana Granata, Encarna Guillén-Navarro, Cristina Hernando, Caroline E. Laverriere, Agne Liedén, Olaya Villa-Marcos, Meriel McEntagart, Ann Nordgren, Chiara Pantaleoni, Céline Pebrel-Richard, Catherine Sarret, Francesca L. Sciacca, Ronnie Wright, Bronwyn Kerr, Eric Glasgow, Siddharth Banka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#511,957
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#220
of 5,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,192
of 409,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.