↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal and plant specific vulnerability of amphibian tadpoles to the invasion of a novel cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Seasonal and plant specific vulnerability of amphibian tadpoles to the invasion of a novel cyanobacteria
Published in
Biological Invasions, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10530-018-1861-6
Authors

John C. Maerz, Susan B. Wilde, Vanessa K. Terrell, Brigette Haram, R. Clay Trimmer, Chelsea Nunez, Erin Cork, Allan Pessier, Sue Lannoo, Michael J. Lannoo, Sara L. Diamond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,847,669
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#592
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,138
of 351,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.