↓ Skip to main content

Lack of microbiological concordance between bone and non-bone specimens in chronic osteomyelitis: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Lack of microbiological concordance between bone and non-bone specimens in chronic osteomyelitis: an observational study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-2-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés F Zuluaga, Wilson Galvis, Fabián Jaimes, Omar Vesga

Abstract

Prognosis of chronic osteomyelitis depends heavily on proper identification and treatment of the bone-infecting organism. Current knowledge on selecting the best specimen for culture is confusing, and many consider that non-bone specimens are suitable to replace bone cultures. This paper compares the microbiology of non-bone specimens with bone cultures, taking the last as the diagnostic gold standard. Retrospective observational analysis of 50 patients with bacterial chronic osteomyelitis in a 750-bed University-based hospital. Concordance between both specimens for all etiologic agents was 28%, for Staphylococcus aureus 38%, and for organisms other than S. aureus 19%. The culture of non-bone specimens to identify the causative organisms in chronic osteomyelitis produced 52% false negatives and 36% false positives when compared against bone cultures. Diagnosis and therapy of chronic osteomyelitis cannot be guided by cultures of non-bone specimens because their microbiology is substantially different to the microbiology of the bone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 31%