↓ Skip to main content

Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Sociology, March 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 388)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8769 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Published in
Qualitative Sociology, March 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00988593
Authors

Juliet M. Corbin, Anselm Strauss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8,769 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 80 <1%
United Kingdom 50 <1%
Germany 35 <1%
Canada 19 <1%
Netherlands 16 <1%
South Africa 16 <1%
Australia 13 <1%
Portugal 12 <1%
Brazil 12 <1%
Other 124 1%
Unknown 8392 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1975 23%
Student > Master 1782 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 841 10%
Researcher 604 7%
Student > Bachelor 550 6%
Other 1312 15%
Unknown 1705 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1842 21%
Social Sciences 1738 20%
Computer Science 595 7%
Psychology 416 5%
Arts and Humanities 336 4%
Other 1899 22%
Unknown 1943 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,035,444
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Sociology
#22
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 14,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Sociology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them