↓ Skip to main content

Is Activity Tracker–Measured Ambulation an Accurate and Reliable Determinant of Postoperative Quality of Recovery? A Prospective Cohort Validation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Activity Tracker–Measured Ambulation an Accurate and Reliable Determinant of Postoperative Quality of Recovery? A Prospective Cohort Validation Study
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, October 2019
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000003913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faraj Massouh, Rachel Martin, Bokman Chan, Julia Ma, Vikita Patel, Michael P Geary, John G Laffey, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Faraj W Abdallah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 29 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,687,827
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#1,473
of 8,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,887
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#39
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.