Title |
Chemical and molecular identification of the invasive termite Zootermopsis nevadensis (Isoptera: Archotermopsidae) in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13355-018-0545-0 |
Authors |
Toshihisa Yashiro, Yuki Mitaka, Tomonari Nozaki, Kenji Matsuura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 61% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,577,745
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Applied Entomology and Zoology
#71
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,725
of 440,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Entomology and Zoology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.