| Title |
A comprehensive assessment of the structural similarity index
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Signal, Image and Video Processing, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11760-009-0144-1 |
| Authors |
Richard Dosselmann, Xue Dong Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,471,842
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Signal, Image and Video Processing
#35
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,196
of 94,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Signal, Image and Video Processing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them