| Title |
Orientation in a desert lizard (Uma notata): time-compensated compass movement and polarotaxis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00613978 |
| Authors |
Kraig Adler, John B. Phillips |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 33% |
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2011.
All research outputs
#6,440,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#368
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,365
of 9,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them