| Title |
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vikas Soekhai, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, Alan R. Ellis, Caroline M. Vass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 56% |
| Scientists | 17 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 393 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Researcher | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 14% |
| Unknown | 135 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 42 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Psychology | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 75 | 19% |
| Unknown | 153 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#803,184
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#19
of 2,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,321
of 365,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.