| Title |
Exclusion of Intra-Atrial Thrombus Diagnosis Using D-Dimer Assay Before Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.09.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Milhem, Pierre Ingrand, Frédéric Tréguer, Olivier Cesari, Antoine Da Costa, Dominique Pavin, Philippe Rivat, Nicolas Badenco, Sélim Abbey, Noura Zannad, Pierre François Winum, Jacques Mansourati, Philippe Maury, Hugues Bader, Arnaud Savouré, Frédéric Sacher, Marius Andronache, Caroline Allix-Béguec, Christian De Chillou, Frédéric Anselme, ATE Study Group, Alain Al Arnaout, Walid Amara, Mathieu Amelot, Clément Bars, Lucile Becoulet, Paul Bru, Philippe Chevalier, Jean-Philippe Darmon, Jean-Claude Deharo, Antoine Dompnier, Cécile Duplantier-Duchene, Fabrice Extramiana, Jean-Paul Faugier, Charles Guenancia, Jérôme Horvilleur, François Jourda, Gabriel Laurent, Nicolas Lellouche, Isabelle Magnin Poull, Olivier Piot, Antoine Roux, Yannick Saludas, Julien Seitz, Jérôme Taieb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| France | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,605,027
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#359
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,988
of 367,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.