| Title |
Effect of different protein sources on satiation and short-term satiety when consumed as a starter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rania Abou-Samra, Lian Keersmaekers, Dino Brienza, Rajat Mukherjee, Katherine Macé |
| Abstract |
Because the source of protein may play a role in its satiating effect, we investigated the effect of different proteins on satiation and short-term satiety. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| Mexico | 3 | 15% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 213 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#197,840
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#79
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#877
of 254,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.