↓ Skip to main content

Prehospital and Emergency Department Ultrasound in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Prehospital and Emergency Department Ultrasound in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00068-009-9082-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Ruesseler, Thomas Kirschning, Raoul Breitkreutz, Ingo Marzi, Felix Walcher

Abstract

Blunt abdominal trauma is a challenging aspect of trauma management. Early detection has a major impact on patient outcome. In contrast to physical examination, computed tomography is known to be a sensitive and specific test for blunt abdominal injuries. However, it is time-consuming and thus contraindicated in hemodynamically unstable patients. Therefore, focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) offers a fast and easily applicable screening method to identify patients for urgent laparotomy without any further diagnostics. FAST detects, with high sensitivity, intraperitoneal fluid that accumulates in dependent areas indicating blunt abdominal trauma. FAST has been established as a gold standard early screening method for blunt abdominal trauma when performing trauma management in the emergency department (ED) based on the Advanced Trauma Life Support(®) algorithm. The development of hand-held ultrasound devices facilitated the introduction of FAST into prehospital trauma management. It was demonstrated that prehospital FAST (p-FAST) can be performed with high sensitivity and specificity, and can lead to significant changes in prehospital trauma therapy and management. Standardized training with both theoretical and hands-on modules is mandatory in order to gain the skills required to perform FAST or p-FAST well.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 6 9%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 30%