| Title |
Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-008-0942-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Ellard, C. Bellanné-Chantelot, A. T. Hattersley, European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN) MODY group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 64 | 23% |
| Unknown | 67 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2016.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#5,331
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,219
of 98,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#32
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.