↓ Skip to main content

Determination of a suitable voriconazole pharmacokinetic model for personalised dosing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 477)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Determination of a suitable voriconazole pharmacokinetic model for personalised dosing
Published in
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10928-015-9462-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. J. McDougall, Jennifer Martin, E. Geoffrey Playford, Bruce Green

Abstract

Model based personalised dosing (MBPD) is a sophisticated form of individualised therapy, where a population pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamic model is utilised to estimate the dose required to reach a target exposure or effect. The choice of which model to implement in MBPD is a subjective decision. By choosing one model, information from the remaining models is ignored, as well as the rest of the literature base. This manuscript describes a methodology to develop a 'hybrid' model for voriconazole that incorporated information from prior models in a biologically plausible manner. Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal with difficult to predict PK, although it does have a defined exposure-response relationship. Nine population PK models of voriconazole were identified from the literature. The models differed significantly in structural components. The hybrid model contained a two-compartment disposition model with mixed linear and nonlinear time-dependent clearance. The parameters for the hybrid model were determined using simulation techniques. Validation of the hybrid model was assessed via visual predictive checks, which indicated the majority of the variability in the literature models was captured by the hybrid model. The predictive performance was assessed using four different sampling strategies of limited concentrations from ten richly PK sampled subjects to predict future concentrations. Overall, the hybrid model predicted future concentrations with good precision. Further prospective and retrospective validation of the hybrid model is required before it could be used in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Computer Science 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,169,202
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#10
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,453
of 395,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them